Видео

😂😂 never heard of anyone migrating east unless revenge was involved.

Then why do turkish hate thier Northern chinese brother bruh blame the government not people for ugyhur

Turkey would be like it was pre-2002 AKP rule. During the kemalist era. A country with hyperinflation, with no geopolitical strategy or foreign policy, self-imposed isolation and non interference, and certainly no influence on other countries whether that’s in the Middle East/Africa/islamic world nor in Ukraine or Eastern Europe, with no real independent home manufactured military, low GDP growth rates, and a bad sewage system. Basically like other Balkan countries or Greece. They wouldn’t be in the EU, because Turkey applied to join the EU in 1987 and they still couldn’t get in under strict secular Kemalist rule. 15 years before Erdoğan/AKP and their somewhat islamification and transformation of Turkey to what it is today. It would be an authoritarian country ruled by one man. One man that is praised and loved by the majority of the Turkish population so much so that he has become a sanctity and there are blasphemy laws against him. If anyone in turkey speaks against him on the streets, the citizens themselves will take matters into their own hands in violence in the form of vigilante justice. Similar to how some Muslims take matters into their own hands when their Prophet is insulted on the streets of Europe or anywhere. Similar to Bangladesh however, due to economic conditions, disagreement regarding economic and social policy, despite being the founder of Turkey, he could be voted out in elections. A different party could be voted into power. There could even be a coup by the Turkish military against him and they could assassinate him similar to how the Bangladeshi military assassinated the founder of Bangladesh whom they fought for alongside against Pakistan for their independence. Who knows. People could grow tired of such a long rule and just not want him to be the leader anymore even if he was the founder who led the independence of their country, which is exactly what happened in Bangladesh with the secular socialist Sheikh Mujibur Rahman who led the independence war of Bangladesh against Pakistan, yet despite that, his own Bangladeshi military who he led to victory, assassinated him. He is still seen as a National hero in Bangladesh. Therefore, Ataturk could see the same happen to him despite being seen as a national hero if he were to rule longer with the Turkish military getting involved, just like they have done already in the past and assassinating. The Kurdish and Islamist insurgence against Turkey would be much more serious and stronger with a more popular support from the Kurdish regions in the south east alongside the conservative Turks across Anatolia possibly forming a Kurdish and Turkish Islamist alliance. It would be much more of a serious threat to Turkey because of how strictly secular and opposed to religion the Turkish state would be under Ataturk using the French definition of Secularism/Laicite. This is compared to Erdogan and the AKP who are much more lax secularists following the secularism of the Anglo sphere which is much more accommodating to religious expression which appeases the Turkish conservatives and religious folk as well as the many of the Kurds which reduces any potential support groups like the PKK or other insurgencies could have gained. Under Ataturk, Turkey would be facing some serious insurgencies and instability from Kurdish Nationalist and Turkish Islamist alliance. The Kurds would be extremely polarised in Turkey due to the either “you’re either a Turk or you’re a terrorist” narratives whereby there is no middle ground for recognition of a Turkish citizen with Kurdish heritage. Due to this extreme polarisation of the Kurds in Turkey, alongside the fall of Iraq, and the semi-autonomous region of Iraqi Kurdistan, alongside the De-facto Kurdish region in northern Syria of Rojava, there would be much much more increased co-operation between the Kurdish insurgency in Turkey with popular support amongst the Kurds in Turkey and the semi autonomous regions of Kurdistan in Iraq and Syria. They would be transferring weapons and more no doubt. Saudi Arabia and the UAE will see Turkey as an extremely friendly country who they become natural allies with. Turkey being a strictly secular country with no interest in being apart of the Islamic world, yet having a large number of soldiers in their army to fight for them, and being close or part of the Middle East, the Saudis and UAEs would try to get Turkey on their bankroll just like how they have Pakistan and Egypt and Sudan on their bankroll due to their weak economy + large army combo which makes it perfect for them to use. Turkey would be seen as having no threat to the Saudi dominance and influence over the Islamic world and therefore Turkey and Saudi would definitely be much closer allies than under the Erdogan/AKP rule. Under Ataturk there would likely be much less foreigners and especially Arab/Muslim immigrants. Apart from the odd English retired couple moving to live the rest of their elderly lives on the beaches of Antalya enjoying the sun, there will not be many immigrants. There will be more emigrant Turks moving to Europe in search of a better life. Both conservative/religious and non religious Turks would move to Europe to study there due to the restrictions on Hijab in Turkey under Ataturk and/or better education/life abroad in Europe. This is because there would not have been the Turkish economic boom of 2002-2014 under AKP rule if Ataturk was still here. Therefore, the Turks would continue to emigrate from Turkey to places like Germany, Netherlands, UK etc. instead to find better opportunities. There would be higher remittances coming into Turkey as a result probably also. Moreover, there would probably still be Syrian refugees in Turkey due to the Syrian civil war. However, there would be far less because most of them would have been sent back to Syria. This is because Turkey under Ataturk would not have intervened in northern Syria supporting the rebels, nor would they have been able to intervene due to lack of strong military technology. So Bashar al Assad would have likely won the Syrian civil war completely, and re-captured 100% of the territory including Idlib and northern Syria regions that are currently under de-facto joint Turkish and Syrian rebel rule. With no turkey involved, the civil war would have been won by Assad (with help from Russian air support), and Turkey would have wanted to make a deal with Syria to repatriate the refugees back. In addition, under Ataturk, Turkey would no longer be the hub for sunni Islamic scholarship and especially Islamic theology and the traditional Sunni Ash’ari and Maturidi schools of theology would not have been revived in the Islamic world. Under the AKP government’s waqf funding, the best Islamic theologians, philosophers and jurists around the Islamic world such as Dr. Ali Mahmoud Al Omari, Dr. Hamza Al Bakri etc. now reside in turkey teaching in various universities such as in Istanbul, sultan Ahmet university etc. Muslims students of knowledge from the east and the west go to Istanbul to study the Islamic sciences such as ilm Al kalam. However, under Ataturk, there would definitely be no funding for such intellectual activities. It is very likely that the classical traditional Sunni ashari and maturidi schools of theology would be in severe decline due to this. The Sunni Salafi/Wahhabi schools of theology would be extremely widespread in the Islamic world as a result with nothing to challenge it. Finally, Qatar would probably not exist as a country today. Turkey under Erdogan/AKP essentially saved Qatar from the 2017 Saudi-UAE-Bahrain-Egypt Land and Air boycott. Saudi Arabia was also planning to invade Qatar. The presence of the first Turkish military base in Qatar, the first in the Arabian peninsula since the ottoman period, acted as a deterrent, protecting Qatar and giving her essential food and aid supplies. Under Ataturk, Turkish relations with the Islamic world, the Arabs, the Muslim brotherhood influence and connection based in Qatar and Turkey’s AKP would not exist. Turkey would not have the strong military capability either to provide military bases, training, and technology to themselves never mind other countries. Therefore, Qatar would likely not exist as a country anymore, and it would become a Saudi province. Therefore, Hamas and Taliban would have to find a new mediator and partner to help them and they would struggle to find a country to provide them with a political office to setup in. Qatari funding would not exist for Hamas and therefore Hamas would be significantly weaker and possibly unable to attack Israel. Although, the Iranians are still the main backers of Hamas, so Hamas would still pose a threat, but probably a smaller threat due to lack of Qatari funds. That’s all for now.

Tengri > allah

❤❤Keep going, brother ❤❤❤❤

I don't think Hungerians used to practice incest like iranians, please put thia iranian shit out of everything We are fed up with persian manipulation of history

I had a similar thought where some Chinese people of today should have some Turkic ancestors since there were migrations and integrations back then

Hi my name is mohsin khan from pakistan my Gerent fathar say to me i am original khan not phatan my family came to babar king to india my family try last name all khan

Great videos mate

Gog and Magog AKA the cavemen AKA Turks Cockazoids and Mongoloids!

Çalışmalarınızı takdir ediyorum. Ancak videoyu kurgularken görsel seçimine özen gösterilmelidir. Şöyle ki, bu videoda Troya'dan bahsederken kullanılan fotoğraf maalesef Assos fotoğrafı. Bilginize Selamlar... (I appreciate your work. However, care should be taken in visual selection when editing the video. Namely, the photo used when talking about Troy in this video is unfortunately the Assos photo. Greetings for your information...)

I spent a year in Turkey and had several experiences where I thought I was hearing Japanese, only to realize few seconds later it was actually Turkish. This piqued my interest in the similarities between the two languages, and now I'm here! Thank you for the video!

Ich sehe schon, dass du ein ziemlicher Fan von Mustafa ja mal Atatürk bist. Naja, er hat ja auch behauptet, dass die Vorfahren der Türken die hetita sind aber genauso wie Mustafa Türk. Hast du auch ein psychisches Problem? Ich glaube, ihr sollt euch alle mal bei einem Psychiater blicken lassen, damit ihr euch helfen kann, euren komplex zu überwinden. Das ist nicht gesund. Mein Freund ja zu deiner Info. Man hat keilschrift Tafeln gefunden von den alten hetitan, wo man ganz klar ohne wenn und aber nachweisen kann, dass diese Leute eine germanische Sprache gesprochen haben bzw. Indogermanische Sprache, was wiederum beweist, dass ihr mit diesem Volk rein gar nichts zu tun habt. So und jetzt komme ich mal zu den Türken. Das türkische Volk ist ein grossartiges Volk. Es hat in der Geschichte sehr viel verändert. Es hat die Geschichte geprägt. Bis heute lebt niemand den Islam so gut wie die Türken. Das sage ich dir als Kurde, aber ihr solltet echt von diesem Geist ablassen, den es nicht gibt. Hier Dieter haben zwei bis 3000 Jahre vor Christus gelegt, da hat noch nicht mal das Wort Türke existiert

So, as Turkic peoples, we WuZ actually KaNgz!

Only the elite, and who followed the yarliq. Rest of them went to rage and denied to change faith. As faith is not like a rag that you change every day. That caused coup, and turmoil, and many escorting forces decided to give finger, or leave the region. Jagfar tarihi tells it.

My descendants are Ashkenazi Jews. I started to research the history in 1994. It’s very interesting the narrative has changed since Zionist have polluted the internet with their “Ministry of Truth” editing. Not all Germans were Nazis and not all Jews are Zionist. I suspect this documentary has been created and published by Zionist trying to spread misinformation. Zionism like Nazism, has no place in modern society. It’s a cancer towards Judaism and creates antisemitism by its actions and ideology.

Ich bin immer wieder erstaunt über die Tiefe der Einsichten und Analysen, die meine Mitteilnehmer an den Tag legen.🧡

Please do a video about Yamnaya (Kurgan) people from Bronze Age. They have a lot of similarities with the Turkic people. They may even be the Proto-Turks who migrated to the steps to the east and west.

Originally none of the countries was Christians. Poland litvanians etc none of them so seems like it's no reason to talk about this seriously

There wont be much left if you take Turks out of history books.

Oğuz Kağana is basically like King Arthur...

Die Kameradschaft in dieser Gemeinschaft ist spürbar. Es ist klar, dass wir alle gemeinsam nach Wissen streben.🌺

You're no different than Afrocentrists claiming everyone was Black.

Are hunnic empire father of khazar and why didn't khazar rapidly expanded into European land like atila

Тенгрианство это мир и благодать, живи в гормонии с природой как просто.

Your Karakhanid video was fantastic. I hadn't previously seen such a good presentation on the Eurasian steppe people in these times.

So these were the black khans? Okay

yeah, like the Tarim basin. They have followed where water were.

बहुत सुन्दर प्रस्तुति

Qarluks __Ozbek turks Qarahanids

Qarluqlar bu Uzbeklardir. Birinchi islomni qabul qilgan. Talas savashida Chinga qarshi muslulmonlar bilan birga yenggan.Ismoil Somoniy ham turk islom tarihchilari oguzlardan ekanin yozishgan

What do you think of this historical hypothesis about the origin of the Qarakhanids, based on archaeological evidence: Some scholars mark the beginning of the history of the Qarakhanids as starting with the year 840, when a new confederation in Semirechye emerged from the Qarluq, Chigil, Yaghma and other Turkic tribes after the fall of the Uyghur Khaganate. Due to these multi-tribal components of the new con- federation, the origin of the Qarakhanid ruling elite is considered to be debata- ble. The most recent theory based on numismatic evidence has been suggest- ed by Boris Kochnev, who claimed that the Qarakhanid origin related to the Igdish (Idgish) clan of the Chigil tribe that was one of the components of the Qarluq confederation.

Today's Uzbeks consist of three Turkic branches. Karluks Oghuzes Kipchaks. in 756-940 the Karluks created the Karluk Kaganate and in 961 the Karluks created the Karakhanid states and famous writers of the Karluk Karakhanid state named Yusuf Khos Khojib, Mahmud Kashgari and Khuzha Ahmad Yasaviy wrote books purely in the Karluk dialect which is now calledUzbek language. even the most ancient Minaret in Bukhara, built in 1127 by order of Arslankhan Muhammad who was the ruler of the Karluk Karakhanid state. The Oguzes created the states of the Seljuks and Khorezmshahs. During the Chigatai ulus, the Karluk dialect was the main language of the Chigatai ulus and for this reason the Chigatai language was called. Even Tamerlane and all the Timurids before Muhammad Babur wrote in the Karluk dialect. in the years 1450-1500, at the head of Uzbek Abulkhair and Sheybani Khan, the Nomadic Uzbeks came, who are Türks from the Kipchak branch and gradually under the rule of the Nomadic Uzbeks, the local Türks Karluks and Oguzes also began to call themselves Uzbeks and the Karluk dialect also began to be called the Uzbek language. Before the arrival of Tsarist Russia, we Uzbeks had three centralized states. Kokand Khanate Bukhara Emirate Khiva Khanate. due to the invasion of Tsarist Russia, these states fell and after the fall of these states, the authorities of Tsarist Russia and the Bolsheviks drew the map in different ways several times and from part of the territory of the Uzbeks they drew Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and the northeastern territory of the Uzbeks, the Kokand Khanatehaving given it to the Kazakhs, from part of the territory of the Uzbeks they drew a large KazSSR and from scratch for the Kazakhs they created a centralized state that they did not have, and the Uzbeks were left with a small territory, cutting us off from the Caspian Sea and from China, and in the north they cut us off from Lake Balkhash. in the north, Turkestan Sairam Chimkent and in the fruit to Lake Balkhash and in the east to China, the whole of South-Eastern Kazakhstan is part of the territory of the Uzbeks, the Kokand Khanate and the Syr Darya River was an internal river of the Kokand Khanate...

You have Budapest in the wrong position on your map n

Hi thanks for the video But in the video while you are talking about Amir Temur, only chizngiz khan's statue is appearing. There are plenty of Temur's statue in Uzbekistan. You have could use those statues. Jayhun is not turkish word it is turkix word I think. Because in central asia every person call it Jayhoon.

Hi thanks for the video But in the video while you are talking about Amir Temur, only chizngiz khan's statue is appearing. There are plenty of Temur's statue in Uzbekistan. You have could use those statues. Jayhun is not turkish word it is turkix word I think. Because in central asia every person call it Jayhoon.

Mukhan Han'in kizinin genetik analizi neredeyse tamamen kuzeydogu asya kokenli olduklarini gosteriyor.